NCADC News ServiceThe National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns (NCADC) has received a number of calls in the last two weeks from people who went to Lunar House in Croydon to claim asylum. They told us that they have been *'Tagged' fitted with an electronic monitoring device around their ankle. A monitoring unit has been installed in the accommodation address where they 'must' reside. When they are required to be at home, the tag will send a signal to a monitoring unit and the monitoring unit sends a signal to the monitoring control centre. Those 'tagged' have also been required to comply with reporting restrictions, that is weekly/monthly visits to their nearest immigration reporting/enforcement centre.
We have checked around and '*Tagging' Electronic Monitoring of new asylum seekers has arrived in the UK. A reversal of Home Office policy means that no one will be able to *refuse to be tagged if the Home Office requires it, a refusal is certain to result in detention.
Contact Management (CM): This is the Home Office term for controlling an asylum seeker from the moment they notify the Home Office of their arrival in the UK, till acceptance or rejection of their claim. Tagging is part & parcel of CM and the Tag will remain on the person for the duration of the claim.
All eleven reporting/enforcement centres in the UK now have a person called the 'Electronic Monitoring Champion' (Wonder horses) who will be responsible for overseeing 'Tagging'. NCADC has contacted a number of centres to try and obtain written material on Electronic Monitoring; on each occasion we drew a blank. We spoke to some of the 'wonder horses'; they were clueless as to what their job entailed. These posts seem to be a very recent creation by the Home Office and no training as yet that we know of has been given to the staff.
NCADC would like to make it clear that we are totally opposed to 'Tagging', this '*stigmata' is an unacceptable invasion of an asylum seekers person. Further, where the monitoring device is installed in a house/flat/hostel, it turns that person's home - a place of privacy and safety, into a detention centre.
John O for NCADC
Background: Section 36 of the Immigration and Asylum (treatment of claimants etc) Act 2004 allows for the electronic monitoring (Tagging) of those liable to be detained under the Immigration Acts. This includes asylum seekers, illegal entrants, those found working in breach of their conditions of stay, overstayers, people subject to further examination at a port of entry, and those refused leave to enter.
Consent of an individual to be tagged was not a statutory requirement of the Act but consent was introduced as a matter of policy outside the rules. However, in November of last year Tony McNulty rescinded this concession and changed the policy to allow the Immigration Service to draw up 'contact management' plans without first seeking the consent of the individual. This means that an asylum seeker on applying for asylum will be told he will be tagged, if an individual refuses to be 'Tagged' they will be detained. The same applies to anyone else in breach of immigration rules; accept tagging or be detained.
People in detention can apply for 'Tagging' to their Immigration Case Officer, however there is no information packs available to detainees as to how they would apply and the conditions of the 'Tagging'.
We have checked around and '*Tagging' Electronic Monitoring of new asylum seekers has arrived in the UK. A reversal of Home Office policy means that no one will be able to *refuse to be tagged if the Home Office requires it, a refusal is certain to result in detention.
Contact Management (CM): This is the Home Office term for controlling an asylum seeker from the moment they notify the Home Office of their arrival in the UK, till acceptance or rejection of their claim. Tagging is part & parcel of CM and the Tag will remain on the person for the duration of the claim.
All eleven reporting/enforcement centres in the UK now have a person called the 'Electronic Monitoring Champion' (Wonder horses) who will be responsible for overseeing 'Tagging'. NCADC has contacted a number of centres to try and obtain written material on Electronic Monitoring; on each occasion we drew a blank. We spoke to some of the 'wonder horses'; they were clueless as to what their job entailed. These posts seem to be a very recent creation by the Home Office and no training as yet that we know of has been given to the staff.
NCADC would like to make it clear that we are totally opposed to 'Tagging', this '*stigmata' is an unacceptable invasion of an asylum seekers person. Further, where the monitoring device is installed in a house/flat/hostel, it turns that person's home - a place of privacy and safety, into a detention centre.
John O for NCADC
Background: Section 36 of the Immigration and Asylum (treatment of claimants etc) Act 2004 allows for the electronic monitoring (Tagging) of those liable to be detained under the Immigration Acts. This includes asylum seekers, illegal entrants, those found working in breach of their conditions of stay, overstayers, people subject to further examination at a port of entry, and those refused leave to enter.
Consent of an individual to be tagged was not a statutory requirement of the Act but consent was introduced as a matter of policy outside the rules. However, in November of last year Tony McNulty rescinded this concession and changed the policy to allow the Immigration Service to draw up 'contact management' plans without first seeking the consent of the individual. This means that an asylum seeker on applying for asylum will be told he will be tagged, if an individual refuses to be 'Tagged' they will be detained. The same applies to anyone else in breach of immigration rules; accept tagging or be detained.
People in detention can apply for 'Tagging' to their Immigration Case Officer, however there is no information packs available to detainees as to how they would apply and the conditions of the 'Tagging'.
Links:
Fact Sheet: Electronic Monitoring - Tagging
Immigration: Electronic Monitoring
Allow the Immigration Service to draw up contact management plans without first seeking the consent of the individual.
Contact Management (CM) is the means by which the Immigration Service (IS) maintains contact with asylum seekers & other applicants throughout the application process.
*Stigmata: a mark of disgrace associated with a particular circumstance
Fact Sheet: Electronic Monitoring - Tagging
Immigration: Electronic Monitoring
Allow the Immigration Service to draw up contact management plans without first seeking the consent of the individual.
Contact Management (CM) is the means by which the Immigration Service (IS) maintains contact with asylum seekers & other applicants throughout the application process.
*Stigmata: a mark of disgrace associated with a particular circumstance
